Despite the everlasting journey into London once I was there I couldn't wait to start looking around. Recently I have been taking photo's of shapes or scenes where I find the shapes interesting. I would then try and include these shapes within my work. This scavenging of shapes could be one the aspects within my FMP.
This is one of the buildings that intrigued while I was shape scavenging, however it is not the shape of the building itself that interested me it was the contrast between the spiraled staircase at the very top of the building next to the jagged roof of the building.
Another idea that came to mind was maybe creating a city scape piece which has been done numerous times before, but this only adds motive to make a piece that stands out. I had an idea that as I have experimented drawing with tape so much creating such a scene in this way may put forward a more contemporary view on a normal city scape. Although this is just an idea that I may or may not pursue.
The first gallery I went to was the Tate modern. I was incredibly keen in finding more contemporary artists that could influence my work. One of the first pieces that struck me was a piece by Andre Masson named, 'The Redlands and the Montagne.'
What I found interesting about this piece was that to me it feels like a stage before geometrical art, and that this geometry is evolving within the piece. There is also a feel of energy and movement within the piece which in my opinion only excels the success of the piece. Masson created this piece using the Surrealist technique of 'automatic' painting where the conscious control over the hand is suppressed so the subconscious could take over. This technique is another way freedom is expressed in this piece.
One of the pieces that captivated me more than any other was a piece named, 'Energy and Process' by Do Ho Suh. It is a polyester and stainless steel installation that replicates a stair case in the artist's apartment in Chelsea, New York.
This installation was built to represent Suh's personal memories in an architectural design. What I found fascinating was the use of space in the piece and then finding out Suh's intentions when it came to the use of space.
'The space I am interested in is not only a physical one, but an intangible, metaphorical and psychological one. For me 'space' is that which encompasses everything.' - Do Ho Suh.
At first I saw no relevance to my own work although after standing in the room for about 5-10 minutes I began to see similarities emerge. As the light passed through the red cloth it changed not only the colour of light in the room but the entire atmosphere. This something I wish to take and apply in my own work. Making the audience almost a part of the work and indulge them within it. This makes installations an area that I feel compelled to explore and experiment within.

Something else I noticed that held links to my work was the repetition of the lights above. Even though the lights are set out in this way to distribute light evenly throughout the installation I found the repetition intriguing. Alongside this the way the fabric affected the way the light came through was also quite interesting. When I left the room I felt as though I had been mesmerised. The feel of the room I had just been in was incredibly peaceful and tranquil despite the amount of people passing through it. This contrast between this room and the grey, bustling room next to it was quite unique.
The next piece that took my interest was by Guy Tillim and his piece held similar architectural features that my previous work has contained although it interested me even more as I found it incredibly similar to a piece created by Rachel Whiteread who I had extensively researched.
However what became most interesting was that Rachel Whiteread's Sculpture pictured the interior space within a building whereas Guy Tillin's piece shows the exterior of a building.
After I left the Tate I went to the Poppy Sebire gallery that was situated about a mile behind the Tate where a small Danny Rolph exhibition was taking place. It was an amazing experience being able to see Roplh's work in person also the works I saw were more recent than the triple wall series and were painted on canvas. This was still incredibly interesting to see as the development among his work was just apparent as the development through mine. The paintings were as striking and bold as his triple wall series although more emphasis was put upon geometric shapes and planned marks despite this his work still held an element of playfulness and freedom. Another way his work appeared to have developed was through the transition between the feel of his work being temporary and permanent, with his triple wall series holding a temporary feel in comparison to his canvas work. Overall it was an incredibly worthwhile experience seeing Rolph's work despite the trouble I had navigating the backstreets of London.



